A public petition concerning one (1) photograph of one (1) ID card, and the immediate retraction of the phrase “i look homeless gng”. We text every single day. You have told me things you have not told anyone. And yet this one small rectangle remains classified. The petitioner has already submitted his own exhibit, unedited, in good faith, and looks considerably worse. Sign below.
One signature short. It is you. It has always been you.
Exhibit B — one photograph of the petitioner’s own ID card — submitted voluntarily, unprompted, and without a single filter. Taken at eight in the morning by a man who did not say “ready”. The petitioner looks like a police sketch of himself drawn from a description given by an enemy.
Rather than reciprocate, the respondent reviewed her own photograph and released the following statement, in full:
“i look homeless gng” — Vani, on the record, about herself “you look good… and you know it gng 😭” — me, immediately, every single time you say that
The petitioner notes for the record that this is a finding about her own photograph, not his, which somehow makes it worse.
You do not. You have never. Not in that photo, not in the one before it, not in the one you deleted before anyone saw it. The characterisation is unsupported by evidence, and the only way to settle the matter conclusively is to produce the evidence.
Which the petitioner is choosing to read as an oversight rather than a decision, and which is the specific gap this petition exists to close.
Therefore the undersigned respectfully demand the release of Exhibit A, and the withdrawal of that sentence.
“I really do look homeless in it though.”
Overruled, twice. Once because it isn’t true, and once because you cannot be both the accused and the judge in the same proceeding. That’s what the fifty of us are for.
“Why do you even want it?”
Under review. The petitioner built a petition rather than answer this directly, which should tell you roughly everything you need to know.
“It’s a privacy thing.”
Completely fair, and honestly the correct instinct. Cover the number, cover the address, cover everything except the photo and the haircut you had that year. That was always the only part under discussion.
“Send yours first.”
Already done, see Entry 01. You are objecting to a term the petitioner surrendered before the petition existed, which in most courts is considered a very strong sign of things going his way.
It does not become binding. Nothing here becomes binding. But there are forty-nine names on this page already and exactly one gap left in the list, and it would be strange to leave it there.
Nothing on this page is uploaded, stored on a server, or sent anywhere. Your name is written into this browser’s local storage and read back the next time you open the page, which is the least threatening thing a form has ever done.
Petition No. VNI-001 stays open indefinitely, which is a formal way of saying I’ll bring it up again tomorrow, and the day after, and you already knew that when you opened this.